Subject: franklin coverup and D. Hinkson
From: samsontech7@gmail.com
Date: Wed, December 1, 2010
To: Ken Adachi
If Ted Gunderson was instrumental in exposing,investigating, and
prosecuting the child molesters of the Franklin scandal then 1) Why isn't he dead,
in hiding, or in prison like the others? 2) Maybe he was sent there by his
controllers to only go so far in the investigation, focus on the small time local
perps, and ultimately help to cover it up because as far as I know noone went to
jail and the big names were not named.
Did Ted have a part in the false accusations and imprisonment of DH? If so why?
Maybe because Dave's products are cutting edge and Ted's controllers don't want
people to be healthy and live longer.
This is just off the top of my head and I am going to look in the DH incarceration
and expose it as much as I can.
Psycopaths are good to their friends.
***
Hello,
I made it crystal clear on the page you used to send this e-mail that I do not like to engage in anonymous conversations with people who refuse to identify themselves and who lack the basic courtesy of addressing me by my name before launching into whatever diatribe they wish to unload.
Your lack of background knowledge on the Franklin case and your eagerness to draw superficial and dark conclusions about Ted Gunderson tells me more about you than you may realize.
I don't know the specifics of why Hinkson was convicted. I assume he had a jury trial and there must have been SOME reason for convicting him that was persuasive to 12 jurors. I'm not sure he was as innocent as you imagine him to be.
Before jumping the gun, I would get a full transcript of the trial so you know what you're talking about. I do know that David was making a lot of money (millions) and he had apparently gained enemies among his employees, but I don't know the details of those intrigues.
I do know, however, that David Hinkson's interview on Ted Gunderson's short wave radio show set the stage for the Art Bell lawsuit and the mountain of negative publicity arrayed against Ted that took a couple of years to finally rebut and set the record straight on.
It was David Hinkson who told Ted over the air that Art Bell had an indictment quashed in Nevada. It was David Hinkson who broadly hinted that the charges against Bell had something to do with pedophilia. Ted Gunderson had no pre-knowledge of these accusations against Bell and merely responded to Hinkson statements with the normal acknowledgments that we all use when engaged in a conversation such as "Oh" or "uh huh" or "really?" etc.
Yet Ted Gunderson gets hauled into court for "slandering" Art Bell while Hinkson is never even served! It was Hinkson who was making the accusatory statements against Art Bell; NOT Ted Gunderson.
Now wouldn't it be easy for me to turn the tables and now accuse Hinkson of being the Player, the "agent", the Set Up guy, the guy with the "handlers", etc. trying to railroad Ted Gunderson and defame his character?
You see, there's a lot more to these stories than you are privy to and it's real easy to ACCUSE people of having "handlers' and similar conclusions while wallowing in a sea of ignorance with mere bits and pieces of information on the topic.
If you're hoping to have a conversation about this, you need to reach down into your draws, re-discover your balls, and identify yourself-by name.
I detest cowardly lions.
Sincerely, Ken Adachi
***
Subject: Re: franklin coverup and D. Hinkson
From: "James Real" <samsontech7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, December 7, 2010
To: Ken Adachi
ok, I was wrong.
It wasn't Ted G. who accused falsesly and prosecuted DH. It
was FBI agent William Long. A while back I couldn't find any news about this
and somehow got Ted's name mixed up with it in my brain.
I don't know what
to make of the whole Art Bell drama. But why did Ted let DH run his mouth.
And why did Dave do that. I like Dave and I don't know why he did something
so stupid.
James
***
Hi James,
Glad you decided to write back. It's much more pleasant to respond to a person with a name, even if it is a pseudonym, rather than an unsigned e-mail address.
I discussed the Art Bell lawsuit and David Hinkson's radio interview with Ted Gunderson in a lengthy article I posted on May 1, 2000, called The Smearing of Ted Gunderson, Part 1
I bear no ill will towards David Hinkson and I approve of the products he was selling, so I'm in agreement with you there.
Ted didn't stop David from talking about Art Bell on his radio show because David wasn't saying anything that seemed libelous or unreasonable to Ted. For whatever reason, David brought up the topic of Art Bell and hinted that Bell got an indictment against him quashed in Nye County and that it may have involved children.
Read the transcript at the above link and you will understand that Art Bell's lawsuit against Ted had no merit or basis whatsoever. The entire matter would have been thrown out of court at the pre-trial hearing if two CIA operatives named Kurt Billings and Robert Ghostwolf didn't submit two utterly bogus and untrue affidavits to the court claiming that they overheard Ted tell them that he was going to "get" Art Bell. At the time,. Ted Gunderson didn't even know who Robert Ghostwolf was, let alone ever talk to him.
There was no trial and no jury decision. Ted's insurance company told them that they wanted to settle and that they did not want to go to trail. Ted had no choice in the matter. He told the insurance company lawyer that he didn't want to settle and he wanted to go to trail to clear his name, but the insurance layer said no; they wanted to settle. Ted doesn't know how much the insurance company settled for with Bell's lawyer because Ted refused to sign off on the release papers which required a non-disclosure confidentiality agreement.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.