I am a licensed physician, continuously practicing medicine in Florida since 1982. I have become increasingly disturbed by the reckless practices of vaccine manufacture and administration; and have become even more concerned over the recent moves by federal and state governments to mandate vaccinations over the legitimate protests of those citizens who choose to refuse the introduction of vaccines upon their persons - for whatever reason.
I believe that there is a much more practical way to protect the sovereignty of our bodies without having to depend on an increasingly intrusive government to protect these rights for us.
My idea is as follows: If one were summoned to obtain a vaccination, the person would arrive and consent (not refuse) to receive the vaccination as long as the medical provider would attest to, and take responsibility for, the safety of the vaccine being administered. This would be done prior to the administration of the vaccine and evidenced by the practitioner's execution of a simple affirmation of safety statement (see attached).
Any practitioner who refuses to sign the statement is essentially conceding that they are not sufficiently secure in the knowledge that the vaccine is safe for administration, and/or that they are unwilling to stand by the safety claims of the manufacturer. Either way, you create a stalemate in the process.
In this setting, the patient has not refused to obtain a vaccination, the provider has refused to administer it - all based upon safety-of-patient grounds, which no healthcare provider, institution, governmental agency, or corporation would dare to abridge - less they subject themselves to the extensive underlying liability that the Affirmation Statement invokes.
I believe that this approach will stifle the unwanted, unconstitutional, unproven and unwarranted policies of mandatory vaccination. In addition, no employee can be held liable for refusing a vaccination under these express conditions, where they are only seeking assurance of safety prior to receiving the vaccination. The protections under the time-tested bodies of law regarding ‘Wrongful Termination’ would trump any demand for compliance using threat of termination of employment as the coopting motivator.
I have attached the Affirmation Statement that I believe will be effective under these circumstances.
I am providing it to you under Fair Use with the hopes that you will circulate this statement to your readers for their wise use.
Only if we stand up together against the encroaching medical tyranny that is undeniably heading our way, will we be able to secure our inalienable rights as a free people.
Thank you for all of your efforts on our behalf.
Dr. Richard Davis, MD
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
OgenX Therapeutics Corporation
Hello Dr Davis,
Great letter, glad you sent it. I will post it with the liability agreement. Many people have mentioned this tactic in prior years as a way to put a cork in the mouth of those who insist on administering vaccines without accepting any liability for the damage they do in the following hours, days, weeks, months, or years.
I hope you can take the time to watch the spectacular series of videos made by Dr Andrew Moulden who had the greatest credentials of anyone to date to authoritatively critique the damage caused by vaccines, and that's ALL vaccines without exception.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.